WHAT RUNS A RUN · FEBRUARY 23, 2026
Data, Dirt, and Distance – Deciphering the Carbon Footprint of Running
In this episode, host Kamal Datta sits down with Dr. Brian McCullough, Associate Professor and Director of the Center for Sport & Sustainability at the University of Michigan and explores explores the environmental impact of events, particularly focusing on the different scopes of emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3) and the challenges associated with data collection and reporting. The speakers discuss how events, especially those held outdoors, can have varying impacts based on participant numbers and the limitations of available data. Key takeaways: Events are concentrated on one weekend or a week. Scope 3 emissions are significantly high for events. Data collection for events can be inconsistent. Comparisons per participant have limitations. Some data may not be precise or complete. Understanding Scope 1 and Scope 2 impacts is crucial. Outdoor events may have different environmental impacts. Reporting on emissions varies by organization. Gray data presents challenges in analysis. Accurate data is essential for sustainability efforts. Episode Chapters
CHAPTERS
3 KEY TAKEAWAYS
- 01Scope 3 emissions are significantly high for events.
- 02Data collection for events can be inconsistent.
- 03Comparisons per participant have limitations.
SHOW NOTES
In this episode, host Kamal Datta sits down with Dr. Brian McCullough, Associate Professor and Director of the Center for Sport & Sustainability at the University of Michigan and explores explores the environmental impact of events, particularly focusing on the different scopes of emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3) and the challenges associated with data collection and reporting. The speakers discuss how events, especially those held outdoors, can have varying impacts based on participant numbers and the limitations of available data.
Key takeaways:
Events are concentrated on one weekend or a week.
- Scope 3 emissions are significantly high for events.
- Data collection for events can be inconsistent.
- Comparisons per participant have limitations.
- Some data may not be precise or complete.
- Understanding Scope 1 and Scope 2 impacts is crucial.
- Outdoor events may have different environmental impacts.
- Reporting on emissions varies by organization.
- Gray data presents challenges in analysis.
- Accurate data is essential for sustainability efforts.
Episode Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Sport Ecology and Sustainability
04:12 The Evolution of Sport Ecology Research
06:49 Frameworks for Measuring Sustainability in Events
09:36 Understanding Carbon Emissions in Sporting Events
12:31 Data Quality and Challenges in Emission Calculations
15:28 The Role of Travel in Scope 3 Emissions
18:20 Improving Data Accuracy and Methodologies
21:12 Future Directions in Sport Ecology Research
25:40 Recommendations for Race Organizers
29:57 The Importance of Reduction Over Offsetting
35:40 Understanding the Sustainable Runner
42:31 Future of Marathons and Sustainability
48:28 Measuring the Impact of Supporters
References:
- Brian's University of Michigan profile - https://experts.umich.edu/13067-brian-mccullough
- Research paper published by Brian - https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14375
- Council for responsible sport - https://www.councilforresponsiblesport.org/